<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A promise to you, dear developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2006/06/15/a-promise-to-you-dear-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2006/06/15/a-promise-to-you-dear-developers/</link>
	<description>XML, identity, crafting, and other tangled musings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pushing String &#187; Microsoft&#8217;s new promise: a welcome development</title>
		<link>http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2006/06/15/a-promise-to-you-dear-developers/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushing String &#187; Microsoft&#8217;s new promise: a welcome development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2006/06/15/a-promise-to-you-dear-developers/#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>[...] I like that they went and called it a &#8220;promise&#8221;, much as I did when announcing Sun&#8217;s similar promise on the SAML2 standard and the Web SSO Interop specs in this post in June. For some reason, I&#8217;ve noticed that non-lawyers get spooked by anything called a &#8220;covenant not to sue&#8221;, I suppose because it contains the &#8220;s-word&#8221;. So this clear language and the deep assurances to developers that Microsoft has offered today are very welcome indeed, and a huge contribution to what is shaping up to be a trend. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I like that they went and called it a &#8220;promise&#8221;, much as I did when announcing Sun&#8217;s similar promise on the SAML2 standard and the Web SSO Interop specs in this post in June. For some reason, I&#8217;ve noticed that non-lawyers get spooked by anything called a &#8220;covenant not to sue&#8221;, I suppose because it contains the &#8220;s-word&#8221;. So this clear language and the deep assurances to developers that Microsoft has offered today are very welcome indeed, and a huge contribution to what is shaping up to be a trend. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
