<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open-source baking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2007/06/10/open-source-baking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2007/06/10/open-source-baking/</link>
	<description>XML, identity, crafting, and other tangled musings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean K.</title>
		<link>http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2007/06/10/open-source-baking/#comment-72147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2007/06/10/open-source-baking/#comment-72147</guid>
		<description>mmm. cookies.  

I agree that the story isn't over with the ingredients, though... Rommelmann's ingredient list varies only slightly from what's on the back of a Nestle package (http://www.verybestbaking.com/recipes/detail.aspx?ID=18476).

With some added comments about nut preferences, though...  Open Source Baking Metadata, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm. cookies.  </p>
<p>I agree that the story isn&#8217;t over with the ingredients, though&#8230; Rommelmann&#8217;s ingredient list varies only slightly from what&#8217;s on the back of a Nestle package (http://www.verybestbaking.com/recipes/detail.aspx?ID=18476).</p>
<p>With some added comments about nut preferences, though&#8230;  Open Source Baking Metadata, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
